<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Everyone&#8217;s a critic. And a psychologist.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.happyscrappy.com/wp/2007/11/19/everyones-a-critic-and-a-psychologist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.happyscrappy.com/wp/2007/11/19/everyones-a-critic-and-a-psychologist/</link>
	<description>is run by Jason Feifer, a writer and editor in Manhattan.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 05:27:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Francis</title>
		<link>http://www.happyscrappy.com/wp/2007/11/19/everyones-a-critic-and-a-psychologist/comment-page-1/#comment-1706</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 20:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.happyscrappy.com/wp/2007/11/19/everyones-a-critic-and-a-psychologist/#comment-1706</guid>
		<description>Once again we see that adding a smiley face to something rude only increases its aggravatingness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again we see that adding a smiley face to something rude only increases its aggravatingness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fluttertongue</title>
		<link>http://www.happyscrappy.com/wp/2007/11/19/everyones-a-critic-and-a-psychologist/comment-page-1/#comment-1679</link>
		<dc:creator>Fluttertongue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 20:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.happyscrappy.com/wp/2007/11/19/everyones-a-critic-and-a-psychologist/#comment-1679</guid>
		<description>This is really rather enraging. Even the BBC has begun to involve its &#039;audience&#039; with message boards and &#039;feedback&#039; but, really, who wants to listen to Joe Blogs sound off about something he has no knowledge in. This contributer, though of course entitled to his own views, is actually re-offending the victim (ie the family of the offender) by airing them in this portal. Free speech is a normative concept and not something that should be translated in simplistic blanket application, especially when harm can be added to harm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really rather enraging. Even the BBC has begun to involve its &#8216;audience&#8217; with message boards and &#8216;feedback&#8217; but, really, who wants to listen to Joe Blogs sound off about something he has no knowledge in. This contributer, though of course entitled to his own views, is actually re-offending the victim (ie the family of the offender) by airing them in this portal. Free speech is a normative concept and not something that should be translated in simplistic blanket application, especially when harm can be added to harm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
